Speaker summary
⁠34%1 analyzed article/video75 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anders Franzen results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Primacy Effect, with Primacy Effect as the most egregious example at 21.3% saturation with 16 hits. Analysis detected 16 faulty-reasoning hits from 75 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (18,616 of 28,364 speakers). This Anders Franzen is better (less manipulative) than 65.60% of the peer group.
Anders Franzen
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠35%Anders Franzen (selected)22%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 75
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

34% percentile
025507510034.4% percentile
21.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos75 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 21.3%21.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Primacy Effect: Speaker 21.3%, sitewide 0.9%Primacy EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos