Speaker summary
⁠100%1 analyzed article/video39 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anders Breivik results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 39 hits. Analysis detected 156 faulty-reasoning hits from 39 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠100% (242 of 28,364 speakers). This Anders Breivik is worse (more manipulative) than 99.20% of the peer group.
Anders Breivik
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 39
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

99% percentile
025507510099.2% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos39 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.8%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos