Speaker summary
⁠34%1 analyzed article/video762.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ana Pombo results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 131 hits. Analysis detected 794 faulty-reasoning hits from 762.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (27,836 of 28,364 speakers). This Ana Pombo is better (less manipulative) than 98.10% of the peer group.
Ana Pombo
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 762.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

2% percentile
02550751001.9% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos762.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 2.5%2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 11.4%11.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 12.9%12.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 1.4%1.4%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 7.3%7.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 9.7%9.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 7.5%Slippery Slope: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 0.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos