Speaker summary
55% 1 analyzed article/video 2,458 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ana Keilson & Justin Reynolds results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Self-Serving Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 320 hits . Analysis detected 1,477 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,458 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 1% (28,143 of 28,364 speakers). This Ana Keilson & Justin Reynolds is better (less manipulative) than 99.20% of the peer group. Ana Keilson & Justin Reynolds
Speaker details
Total words: 2,458
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.8% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 4.5% 4.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 13.0% 13.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 7.2% 7.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 8.2% 8.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 3.7% In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 2.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Straw Man: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst