Speaker summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video50 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amy Suskind results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 74.4% saturation with 64 hits. Analysis detected 258.053 faulty-reasoning hits from 50 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 31.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (14,222 of 28,364 speakers). This Amy Suskind is better (less manipulative) than 50.10% of the peer group.
Amy Suskind
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 50
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510049.9% percentile
31.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos50 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 81.0%81.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 81.0%81.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 74.4%74.4%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 29.6%29.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 25.6%25.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 24.4%24.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 25.6%25.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 25.6%25.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 19.8%19.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 38.4%38.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 81.0%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 81.0%, sitewide 4.6%Negativity Bias: Speaker 74.4%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 38.4%, sitewide 26.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 29.6%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 25.6%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 25.6%, sitewide 2.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 25.6%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 24.4%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos