Speaker summary
⁠100%1 analyzed article/video44 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amy Bowers Cordalis results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 44 hits. Analysis detected 162 faulty-reasoning hits from 44 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 92% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (4,651 of 26,843 speakers). This Amy Bowers Cordalis is worse (more manipulative) than 82.70% of the peer group.
Amy Bowers Cordalis
Speaker details
Total words: 44
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

83% percentile
025507510082.7% percentile
92.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos44 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 68.2%68.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 68.2%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos