Speaker summary
⁠100%1 analyzed article/video32 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amtrak officials results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias and Unattributed Quote, with Burden of Proof as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 96 faulty-reasoning hits from 32 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠100% (230 of 28,364 speakers). This Amtrak officials is worse (more manipulative) than 99.20% of the peer group.
Amtrak officials
Speaker details
Total words: 32
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

99% percentile
025507510099.2% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos32 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Burden of Proof: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.4%Optimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of ProofSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos