Speaker summary
⁠100%1 analyzed article/video18 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Americans for Tax Reform results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Bandwagon, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 18 hits. Analysis detected 72 faulty-reasoning hits from 18 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠100% (217 of 28,364 speakers). This Americans for Tax Reform is worse (more manipulative) than 99.20% of the peer group.
Americans for Tax Reform
Speaker details
Total words: 18
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

99% percentile
025507510099.2% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos18 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 9.1%Bandwagon: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos