Speaker summary
⁠100%1 analyzed article/video38 analyzed words
BS Summary: These American officials results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias and Recency Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 38 hits. Analysis detected 114 faulty-reasoning hits from 38 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠100% (213 of 28,364 speakers). This American officials is worse (more manipulative) than 99.30% of the peer group.
American officials
Speaker details
Total words: 38
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

99% percentile
025507510099.3% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos38 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Recency Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos