Speaker summary
64%1 analyzed article/video174.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amber Smith results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Quote-first Misdirection, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 56% saturation with 126 hits. Analysis detected 348 faulty-reasoning hits from 174.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25.8% and a BS Rank of 42% (16,517 of 28,364 speakers). This Amber Smith is better (less manipulative) than 58.20% of the peer group.
Amber Smith
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 174.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

42% percentile
025507510041.8% percentile
25.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos174.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 56.0%56.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 42.7%42.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 21.3%21.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 13.3%13.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 9.3%9.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 12.0%12.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 56.0%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 42.7%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 21.3%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 19.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos