Speaker summary
⁠100%1 analyzed article/video53.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amanda Carpenter results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Pessimism Bias, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 80 hits. Analysis detected 290 faulty-reasoning hits from 53.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 66.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (6,099 of 28,302 speakers). This Amanda Carpenter is worse (more manipulative) than 78.50% of the peer group.
Amanda Carpenter
Speaker details
Total words: 53.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

79% percentile
025507510078.5% percentile
66.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos53.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 9.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos