Speaker summary
71% 1 analyzed article/video 387 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amanda Brzozowski results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Nature , Representativeness Heuristic , and Circular Reasoning , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 93 hits . Analysis detected 539.692 faulty-reasoning hits from 387 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.3% and a BS Rank of 12% (23,067 of 26,155 speakers). This Amanda Brzozowski is better (less manipulative) than 88.20% of the peer group. Amanda Brzozowski
Speaker details
Total words: 387
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.8% percentile 10.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos387 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Circular Reasoning Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 16.6% 16.6% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 14.5% 14.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 16.8% 16.8% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 14.3% 14.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 2.7% 2.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 7.2% 7.2% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 7.2% 7.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 12.7% 12.7% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 6.8% 6.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 3.3% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 16.6%, sitewide 0.1% Appeal to Nature: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 0.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 1.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst