Speaker summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video57.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amanda Barrow results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 43 hits. Analysis detected 215 faulty-reasoning hits from 57.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 60% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (7,008 of 28,364 speakers). This Amanda Barrow is worse (more manipulative) than 75.30% of the peer group.
Amanda Barrow
Speaker details
Total words: 57.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510075.3% percentile
60.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos57.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos