Speaker summary
⁠43%1 analyzed article/video110.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amal El Haimaur results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Nature, Representativeness Heuristic, and Begging the Question, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 22.4% saturation with 26 hits. Analysis detected 216 faulty-reasoning hits from 110.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (21,743 of 28,364 speakers). This Amal El Haimaur is better (less manipulative) than 76.70% of the peer group.
Amal El Haimaur
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠24%Amal El Haimaur (selected)16%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 110.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

23% percentile
025507510023.3% percentile
15.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos110.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 22.4%22.4%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 21.6%21.6%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 21.6%21.6%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 20.7%20.7%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 15.5%15.5%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 13.8%13.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 8.6%8.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 8.6%8.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 19.8%19.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 6.9%6.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Indoctrination: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 20.7%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 19.2%Burden of Proof: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 0.4%Primacy Effect: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 3.3%IndoctrinationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos