Speaker summary
77%1 analyzed article/video29.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alyssa Cass results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, In-Group Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 33 hits. Analysis detected 121 faulty-reasoning hits from 29.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 70% and a BS Rank of 80% (5,826 of 28,364 speakers). This Alyssa Cass is worse (more manipulative) than 79.50% of the peer group.
Alyssa Cass
Speaker details
Ranking context
Position among analyzed speakers
70.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos29.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile
Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
Sitewide departure map
Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often