Speaker summary
⁠28%1 analyzed article/video80.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alvise Barbieri results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Authority, and Unattributed Quote, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 108 faulty-reasoning hits from 80.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 20.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (18,234 of 26,780 speakers). This Alvise Barbieri is better (less manipulative) than 68.10% of the peer group.
Alvise Barbieri
Speaker details
Total words: 80.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

32% percentile
025507510031.9% percentile
20.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos80.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 19.4%19.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 19.4%19.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos