Speaker summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video69.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alliance Vita results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Burden of Proof, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 69.2% saturation with 54 hits. Analysis detected 270 faulty-reasoning hits from 69.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 38.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (12,223 of 28,364 speakers). This Alliance Vita is worse (more manipulative) than 56.90% of the peer group.
Alliance Vita
Speaker details
Total words: 69.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

57% percentile
025507510056.9% percentile
38.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos69.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 69.2%69.2%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 38.5%38.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 30.8%30.8%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 30.8%30.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 19.2%19.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 19.2%19.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 19.2%19.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 19.2%19.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 69.2%, sitewide 15.9%Straw Man: Speaker 38.5%, sitewide 0.9%Burden of Proof: Speaker 30.8%, sitewide 0.4%Indoctrination: Speaker 30.8%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 19.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos