Speaker summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video81.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aliza Shatzman results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Nature, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 91.5 hits. Analysis detected 396.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 81.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 58.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (7,212 of 28,364 speakers). This Aliza Shatzman is worse (more manipulative) than 74.60% of the peer group.
Aliza Shatzman
Speaker details
Total words: 81.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510074.6% percentile
58.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos81.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos