Speaker summary
⁠84%1 analyzed article/video171 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aline Pellegrino results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 66.2% saturation with 113.25 hits. Analysis detected 307.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 171 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 22.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (17,994 of 28,364 speakers). This Aline Pellegrino is better (less manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group.
Aline Pellegrino
Speaker details
Total words: 171
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

37% percentile
025507510036.6% percentile
22.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos171 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 66.2%66.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 5.3%5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 27.2%27.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 14.0%14.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 13.2%13.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 16.2%16.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 16.2%16.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Optimism Bias: Speaker 66.2%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 27.2%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos