Speaker summary
58%4 analyzed articles/videos127.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alibaba results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Framing Effect, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 35.1% saturation with 67 hits. Analysis detected 240 faulty-reasoning hits from 127.333 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 23.9% and a BS Rank of 39% (17,443 of 28,364 speakers). This Alibaba is better (less manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group.
Alibaba
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 127.333
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

39% percentile
025507510038.5% percentile
23.9% BS Score4 analyzed videos127.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 40.0%40.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 35.1%35.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 18.9%18.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 38.9%38.9%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 13.6%13.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 10.5%10.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 10.5%10.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 40.0%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 38.9%, sitewide 26.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 35.1%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 15.9%Bandwagon: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate