Speaker summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video171 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alexis Pleus results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 52.6% saturation with 120 hits. Analysis detected 492 faulty-reasoning hits from 171 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 27% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (16,018 of 28,364 speakers). This Alexis Pleus is better (less manipulative) than 56.50% of the peer group.
Alexis Pleus
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 171
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

44% percentile
025507510043.5% percentile
27.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos171 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 52.6%52.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 34.2%34.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 21.1%21.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 21.1%21.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 21.1%21.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 36.8%36.8%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 15.8%15.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 13.2%13.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 52.6%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 36.8%, sitewide 19.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 34.2%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos