Speaker summary
⁠100%1 analyzed article/video30 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alexis Hill results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 30 hits. Analysis detected 90 faulty-reasoning hits from 30 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠100% (131 of 28,364 speakers). This Alexis Hill is worse (more manipulative) than 99.50% of the peer group.
Alexis Hill
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 30
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

100% percentile
025507510099.5% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos30 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos