Speaker summary
⁠43%1 analyzed article/video69.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alejandro Puy results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Middle Ground, and Appeal to Authority, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 52.2% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 94 faulty-reasoning hits from 69.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 29.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (14,927 of 28,364 speakers). This Alejandro Puy is better (less manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group.
Alejandro Puy
Speaker details
Total words: 69.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

47% percentile
025507510047.4% percentile
29.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos69.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 52.2%52.2%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Speaker 23.1%23.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 23.1%23.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 21.1%21.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Halo Effect: Speaker 52.2%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 23.1%, sitewide 7.5%Middle Ground: Speaker 23.1%, sitewide 0.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 11.1%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos