Speaker summary
⁠49%5 analyzed articles/videos5,367.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Akela Lacy results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 456.972 hits. Analysis detected 3,810.785 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,367.5 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (28,346 of 28,364 speakers). This Akela Lacy is better (less manipulative) than 99.90% of the peer group.
Akela Lacy
Speaker details
Total words: 5,367.5
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

0% percentile
02550751000.1% percentile
1.6% BS Score5 analyzed videos5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 8.5%8.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 7.4%7.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 2.7%2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 0.9%0.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Straw Man: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos