Speaker summary
⁠100%1 analyzed article/video34 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Airwallex results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 34 hits. Analysis detected 102 faulty-reasoning hits from 34 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠100% (99 of 28,364 speakers). This Airwallex is worse (more manipulative) than 99.70% of the peer group.
Airwallex
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 34
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

100% percentile
025507510099.7% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos34 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos