Speaker summary
⁠66%1 analyzed article/video292 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AI Security Institute (AISI) results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Overconfidence Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 51.7% saturation with 151 hits. Analysis detected 327 faulty-reasoning hits from 292 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 18.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (19,996 of 28,364 speakers). This AI Security Institute (AISI) is better (less manipulative) than 70.50% of the peer group.
AI Security Institute (AISI)
Speaker details
Total words: 292
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

30% percentile
025507510029.5% percentile
18.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos292 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 51.7%51.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 15.8%15.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 15.8%15.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 14.7%14.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 7.5%7.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 51.7%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos