Speaker summary
⁠33%1 analyzed article/video58.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AES Andes results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Nature, Special Pleading, and Unattributed Quote, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 60.2% saturation with 59 hits. Analysis detected 196 faulty-reasoning hits from 58.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 40% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (11,850 of 28,364 speakers). This AES Andes is worse (more manipulative) than 58.20% of the peer group.
AES Andes
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 58.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510058.2% percentile
40.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos58.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 60.2%60.2%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 39.8%39.8%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 39.8%39.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 39.8%39.8%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Speaker 20.4%20.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 60.2%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 39.8%, sitewide 0.2%Special Pleading: Speaker 39.8%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 39.8%, sitewide 1.1%Tu Quoque: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 0.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos