Speaker summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video80 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adrian Herder results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 40% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 227.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 80 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (13,587 of 28,364 speakers). This Adrian Herder is worse (more manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group.
Adrian Herder
Speaker details
Total words: 80
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

52% percentile
025507510052.1% percentile
33.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos80 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 40.0%40.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 35.0%35.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 53.3%53.3%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 26.7%26.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 26.7%26.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 26.7%26.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 26.7%26.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 53.3%, sitewide 26.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 40.0%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 35.0%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 2.0%Recency Bias: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos