Speaker summary
64%1 analyzed article/video31 analyzed words
BS Summary: These ADF results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 62 faulty-reasoning hits from 31 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 100% (67 of 28,364 speakers). This ADF is worse (more manipulative) than 99.80% of the peer group.
ADF
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 31
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

100% percentile
025507510099.8% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos31 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anecdotal: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos