Speaker summary
⁠49%1 analyzed article/video164 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Zimmerman results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Overconfidence Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 55.1% saturation with 101.625 hits. Analysis detected 433.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 164 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (18,723 of 28,364 speakers). This Adam Zimmerman is better (less manipulative) than 66.00% of the peer group.
Adam Zimmerman
Speaker details
Total words: 164
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

34% percentile
025507510034.0% percentile
21.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos164 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 55.1%55.1%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 32.9%32.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 28.9%28.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 17.9%17.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 17.1%17.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 17.9%17.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 13.8%13.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 3.3%3.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 55.1%, sitewide 8.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 32.9%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 28.9%, sitewide 4.6%Negativity Bias: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos