Speaker summary
⁠49%1 analyzed article/video38.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Skaggs results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority and Middle Ground, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 40.6% saturation with 18.063 hits. Analysis detected 45.063 faulty-reasoning hits from 38.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 28% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (15,575 of 28,364 speakers). This Adam Skaggs is better (less manipulative) than 54.90% of the peer group.
Adam Skaggs
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 38.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

45% percentile
025507510045.1% percentile
28.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos38.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 29.0%29.0%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Speaker 14.5%14.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 40.6%40.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 40.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 29.0%, sitewide 11.1%Middle Ground: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos