Speaker summary
⁠59%1 analyzed article/video38 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Lindquist results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic and Quote-first Misdirection, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 73.8% saturation with 29.876 hits. Analysis detected 73.876 faulty-reasoning hits from 38 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 63.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (6,583 of 28,364 speakers). This Adam Lindquist is worse (more manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group.
Adam Lindquist
Speaker details
Total words: 38
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

77% percentile
025507510076.8% percentile
63.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos38 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 78.8%78.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 73.8%73.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 37.5%37.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 78.8%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 73.8%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 37.5%, sitewide 0.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos