Speaker summary
⁠65%1 analyzed article/video39.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Kellogg results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Pessimism Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 15 hits. Analysis detected 78.318 faulty-reasoning hits from 39.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (20,609 of 28,364 speakers). This Adam Kellogg is better (less manipulative) than 72.70% of the peer group.
Adam Kellogg
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 39.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

27% percentile
025507510027.3% percentile
17.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos39.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 24.5%24.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 22.2%22.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 22.1%22.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 4.4%4.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 22.1%22.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 29.7%29.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 16.3%16.3%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 10.3%10.3%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 29.7%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 24.5%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 22.2%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 22.1%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 22.1%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 6.0%Bandwagon: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos