Speaker summary
⁠31%1 analyzed article/video151 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Johnson results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 32.7% saturation with 83 hits. Analysis detected 249 faulty-reasoning hits from 151 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (19,480 of 28,364 speakers). This Adam Johnson is better (less manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group.
Adam Johnson
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠32%Adam Johnson (selected)20%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 151
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

31% percentile
025507510031.3% percentile
19.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos151 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 28.4%28.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 32.7%32.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 17.3%17.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 15.3%15.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 32.7%, sitewide 8.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 28.4%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos