Speaker summary
⁠66%2 analyzed articles/videos70.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Isacson results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 67% saturation with 49.581 hits. Analysis detected 204.697 faulty-reasoning hits from 70.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 33.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (13,542 of 28,364 speakers). This Adam Isacson is worse (more manipulative) than 52.30% of the peer group.
Adam Isacson
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 70.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

52% percentile
025507510052.3% percentile
33.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos70.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 68.8%68.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 67.0%67.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 44.0%44.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 23.8%23.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 23.8%23.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 23.8%23.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 8.3%8.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 10.1%10.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 68.8%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 67.0%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 44.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos