Speaker summary
ā 64%1 analyzed article/video281.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Hamiliton results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Self-Serving Bias, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 56.2% saturation with 181 hits. Analysis detected 934 faulty-reasoning hits from 281.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.1% and a BS Rank of ā 25% (21,398 of 28,364 speakers). This Adam Hamiliton is better (less manipulative) than 75.40% of the peer group.
Adam Hamiliton
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 25%Adam Hamiliton (selected)17%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 281.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

25% percentile
025507510024.6% percentile
16.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos281.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 56.2%56.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 35.1%35.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 40.1%40.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 18.3%18.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 20.2%20.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 14.6%14.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 18.9%18.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 13.3%13.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 6.2%6.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Speaker 56.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 40.1%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 35.1%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 7.5%Begging the Question: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos