Speaker summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video276.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Farrell-Wortman results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Sunk Cost Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 45% saturation with 124.29 hits. Analysis detected 323.894 faulty-reasoning hits from 276.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (24,572 of 28,364 speakers). This Adam Farrell-Wortman is better (less manipulative) than 86.60% of the peer group.
Adam Farrell-Wortman
Speaker details
Total words: 276.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

13% percentile
025507510013.4% percentile
10.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos276.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 45.0%45.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 5.4%5.4%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 14.0%14.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 5.4%5.4%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Speaker 8.8%8.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 15.0%15.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 2.3%2.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 3.9%3.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 6.5%6.5%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Indoctrination: Speaker 45.0%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 8.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 1.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 0.3%Halo Effect: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%IndoctrinationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos