Speaker summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video84 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Barnett results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 41.7% saturation with 39.375 hits. Analysis detected 238.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 84 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (13,535 of 28,364 speakers). This Adam Barnett is worse (more manipulative) than 52.30% of the peer group.
Adam Barnett
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 84
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

52% percentile
025507510052.3% percentile
33.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos84 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 55.6%55.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 41.7%41.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 27.8%27.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 27.8%27.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 27.8%27.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 22.2%22.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 55.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 41.7%, sitewide 8.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 27.8%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 27.8%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 27.8%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 22.2%, sitewide 19.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos