Speaker summary
⁠100%1 analyzed article/video15 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abu Sufia results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Burden of Proof, and Confirmation Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 15 hits. Analysis detected 90 faulty-reasoning hits from 15 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠100% (40 of 28,364 speakers). This Abu Sufia is worse (more manipulative) than 99.90% of the peer group.
Abu Sufia
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 15
Video count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

100% percentile
025507510099.9% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos15 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 100.0%100.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anecdotal: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Burden of Proof: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.4%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos