Speaker summary
⁠100%1 analyzed article/video24 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abigail Spanberger (D) results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect and Unattributed Quote, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 72 faulty-reasoning hits from 24 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠100% (36 of 28,364 speakers). This Abigail Spanberger (D) is worse (more manipulative) than 99.90% of the peer group.
Abigail Spanberger (D)
Speaker details
Total words: 24
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

100% percentile
025507510099.9% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos24 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos