Speaker summary
28%3 analyzed articles/videos62.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abbott results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 30.8% saturation with 44 hits. Analysis detected 84 faulty-reasoning hits from 62.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 29.4% and a BS Rank of 47% (15,074 of 28,364 speakers). This Abbott is better (less manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group.
Abbott
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

47% percentile
025507510046.9% percentile
29.4% BS Score3 analyzed videos62.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 30.8%30.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 28.0%28.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 30.8%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 28.0%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate