Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video54.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aaron Teats results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Availability Heuristic, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 69.8% saturation with 44.31 hits. Analysis detected 152.31 faulty-reasoning hits from 54.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 47.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (12,651 of 35,278 speakers). This Aaron Teats is worse (more manipulative) than 64.10% of the peer group.
Aaron Teats
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠65%Aaron Teats (selected)48%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 54.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

64% percentile
025507510064.1% percentile
47.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos54.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 69.8%69.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 39.6%39.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 39.6%39.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 39.6%39.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Optimism Bias: Speaker 69.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 39.6%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 39.6%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 39.6%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos