Speaker summary
⁠100%1 analyzed article/video48 analyzed words
BS Summary: These 314 Action Victory Fund results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Negativity Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 64 hits. Analysis detected 168 faulty-reasoning hits from 48 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (5,304 of 28,364 speakers). This 314 Action Victory Fund is worse (more manipulative) than 81.30% of the peer group.
314 Action Victory Fund
Speaker details
Total words: 48
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

81% percentile
025507510081.3% percentile
75.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos48 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 19.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos