Publication summary
29%1 analyzed article/video688 analyzed words
BS Summary: These WSLS results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hindsight Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 270 hits. Analysis detected 1,371 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,752 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 63% (150 of 399 publications). This WSLS is worse (more manipulative) than 62.60% of the peer group.
WSLS
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Brookings1%
1%The Banner1%
1%FactCheck.org1%
1%@politifact1%
63%WSLS (selected)3%
99%Utah Hockey Club13%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
100%NBC 6 South Florida33%
Publication details
Total words: 2,752
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

63% percentile
025507510062.6% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 8.5%8.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 1.8%1.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Publication 9.8%9.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Publication 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Publication 0.5%0.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Publication 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 8.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 9.8%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Hindsight Bias: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Nature: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 0.2%Circular Reasoning: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate

Analyzed articles and videos