Publication summary
95%1 analyzed article/video494 analyzed words
BS Summary: These 104.5 The Team ESPN Radio results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 233 hits. Analysis detected 1,846 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,482 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 94% (29 of 410 publications). This 104.5 The Team ESPN Radio is worse (more manipulative) than 93.20% of the peer group.
104.5 The Team ESPN Radio
Publication ranking list
Publication details
Total words: 1,482
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

93% percentile
025507510093.2% percentile
5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 6.3%6.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 15.7%15.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Publication 15.7%15.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Publication 15.4%15.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 10.1%10.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 5.9%5.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Publication 7.0%7.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Publication 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 15.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 10.1%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Publication 15.7%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Publication 15.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Publication 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 7.1%, sitewide 7.5%Loss Aversion: Publication 7.0%, sitewide 2.5%Halo Effect: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Bandwagon: Publication 5.1%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Publication 5.0%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Status Quo Bias: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate

Analyzed articles and videos