Publication summary
79% 1 analyzed article/video 783 analyzed words
BS Summary: These TheWrap results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 335 hits . Analysis detected 1,923 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,349 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 81% (74 of 379 publications). This TheWrap is worse (more manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 2,349
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.7% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 13.7% 13.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 14.3% 14.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 4.8% 4.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Publication 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 13.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 14.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Publication 11.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 8.4%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 4.5%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 0.4% False Dilemma: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst