Author summary
70%1 analyzed article/video783 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stuart N. Brotman results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 335 hits. Analysis detected 1,923 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,349 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 64% (2,220 of 6,170 authors). This Stuart N. Brotman is worse (more manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group.
Stuart N. Brotman
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
64%Stuart N. Brotman (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,349
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

64% percentile
025507510064.0% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 13.7%13.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 14.3%14.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.8%1.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.4%1.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.8%4.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 13.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 11.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.4%False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos