Publication summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These The Daily News results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Self-Serving Bias , and Overconfidence Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.6% saturation with 594 hits . Analysis detected 2,477 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,625 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 379 publications). This The Daily News is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 2,625
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Publication SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.2% 3.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 16.6% 16.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.2% 2.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Publication 8.0% 8.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 22.6% 22.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 16.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 22.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 8.0%, sitewide 3.7% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 5.5%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 3.8%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Special Pleading: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst