Publication summary
22%11 analyzed articles/videos6,009 analyzed words
BS Summary: These TexaSignal results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 1,433 hits. Analysis detected 12,349 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,095 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 29% (398 of 556 publications). This TexaSignal is better (less manipulative) than 71.50% of the peer group.
TexaSignal
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Signal Cleveland1%
1%Montana Free Press1%
1%The Trace1%
1%BridgeDetroit1%
29%TexaSignal (selected)2%
100%The White House9%
100%Utah Hockey Club10%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
Publication details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

29% percentile
025507510028.5% percentile
1.0% BS Score11 analyzed articles25.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Publication 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 2.7%2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Publication 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Publication 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate