Publication summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video247 analyzed words
BS Summary: These St. Catharines Standard results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Middle Ground, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 25.8% saturation with 255 hits. Analysis detected 558 faulty-reasoning hits from 988 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (33 of 410 publications). This St. Catharines Standard is worse (more manipulative) than 92.20% of the peer group.
St. Catharines Standard
Publication ranking list
Publication details
Total words: 988
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

92% percentile
025507510092.2% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles988 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Publication 25.8%25.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 10.0%10.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 3.2%3.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Publication 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 1.1%1.1%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Publication 3.9%3.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Publication 2.3%2.3%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Publication 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Publication 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 10.0%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 25.8%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Middle Ground: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 0.1%Loss Aversion: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Nature: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate

Analyzed articles and videos